
Saturday, January 31, 2009
lucky number forty-four

daily "mmmm"

Friday, January 30, 2009
daily poem
"when it hurts to look back, and you're scared to look ahead, you can look beside you and your best friend will be there"





why I want to be my mom
Thursday, January 29, 2009
looking for the X that marks the spot
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
this is good...
I hope no one gets offended, I'm all for freedom of religion. This is just funny. And proves some points, but I won't go into detail.
I'm as neutral as Switzerland.
Why Can't I Own a Canadian? October 2002
Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? - Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
Your devoted fan,
Jim
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
jessica, we need to talk
oh the places they'll go
Jen, one of the initial Lost Girls, wrote:
....To leave this on a SUPER exciting note, the words: huggie (as in a hug), sexellent (sexy and excellent) and fabletastic (fabulous and fantastic) have been added to the 2009 Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
word of the day
primogeniture • \prye-moh-JENN-uh-chur\ • noun
*1 : the state of being the firstborn of the children of the same parents 2 : an exclusive right of inheritance belonging to the eldest son
Example sentence:
Brian argued that primogeniture gave him the right to the first piece of cake among his siblings.
Did you know?
In many civilizations, past and present, the state of being the oldest among siblings is a key component of inheritance law. “Primogeniture,” which first appeared in English in the early 17th century, derives from the Late Latin “primogenitura,” a combination of the Latin “primus” (“first”) and “genitura” (“birth”), from the past participle of “gignere” (“to beget”). For those who are youngest in birth order, a similar word applies -- “ultimogeniture” -- but this word is newer (first appearing in English in 1882) and much less common.
i've fallen in love....


Tuesday, January 27, 2009
the dangerous tale of the m&m's

because it's too cold to do anything but blog.
Grandmother: Do you know why? Because she thought you were a big boy!
Mother: When you're five, you're going to stop sucking your... (waits for a response)
Three-year-old, face now lit up: My penis!
Girl #1: Look at that painting. Is it called "hairy balls"?
Girl #2: It should be.
Girl #1: If it's not called "hairy balls," I'm leaving.
(girl #2 goes to look, comes back)
Girl #2: Something about a baby.
Girl #1: Okay, that's it.
Girl #2: Look, there are thumbtacks near his balls. That has to suck.
Girl #1: Let's go back to the vagina room.
Suit #1: Do you want a drink?
Suit #2: It's 7 o'clock in the morning.
Suit #1: And...?
Girl #2: I don't own leggings.
Girl #1: Why not?
Girl #2: Because I'm not an asshole.
The website also hosts: overheard in the office, overheard at the beach, overheard everywhere and celebrity wit (we all know my love for the occasional celebrity...)
feeling nostalgic
number one reason to: quit your job if you are a telemarketer
define: empowerment
Monday, January 26, 2009
oops, more grammar
As if the hilarity that is killtheapostrophe.com isn't enough reason to read this blog, look at all the grammar options listed below! PARTY!!!

(number one is the home page, so don't let it bother you that it is missing)
2: Crazy English
3: Apostrophes
4: Your/You're
5: Singular Nouns
6: Plurals
7: Who's Whose
8: Possessive Nouns
9: Its, It's
10: Where, We're
11: Proper Nouns
12: Nouns/Verbs
13: I before E
14: Affect, Effect
15: Me, Myself
16: Separate, Seperate
17: StationEry, StationAry
18: Dot dot dot
19: Ends in O
20: Compliment
21: Misanthrope
22: Pronunciation
23: Past/Passed
24: Colons, Commas
25: Online Dictionaries
27: Proofreading
28: Tshirts etc!
29: Books/Games
30: Fridge Magnets
31: Got questions?
no more grammar. for at least a little while.
some call me a nerd...
As the Moleskin website boasts:
MOLESKINE IS THE HEIR OF THE LEGENDARY NOTEBOOK,
USED BY EUROPEAN ARTISTS AND THINKERS FOR THE PAST
TWO CENTURIES.
THIS SILENT AND DISCREET KEEPER
OF AN EXTRAORDINARY TRADITION, WHICH
HAS BEEN MISSING FOR YEARS, HAS BEEN
REPRODUCED BY THE ITALIAN COMPANY MODO
& MODO SINCE 1998. WITH ITS VARIOUS
DIFFERENT PAGE STYLES IT ACCOMPANIES
THE CREATIVE PROFESSIONS AND HAS BECOME
A SYMBOL OF CONTEMPORARY NOMADISM.
MOLESKINE IS A FAMILY OF NOTEBOOKS
FOR DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS, ACCORDING
WITH A FREE MINDSTYLE, BOTH BASIC
AND EMOTIONAL.

Van Gogh's notebook is a bit older than mine but here is mine, red and beautiful:

Grace has the same planner, however she added to hers a skull and crossbones. So badass. Pictures of hers maybe to come later.
Now, go out and buy a Moleskin. It's the closest to Picasso you'll ever be.
daily grammarian


Lets discard the apostrophe. Its pointless.
For this next one, I decided to just copy and paste something that came straight off the blog because there is a point to be made in what is being said. Plus, it's damn funny.
OK, lets make an effort here and try to think of examples of sentences where apostrophe usage might be said to make a functional difference.
Wait a second, Im still thinking.
Um...
OK, look, Im out of time right now. If you know a sure fire example of a sentence where (for instance) we'll and well or we're and were can be mixed up in a way that actually has an impact in the real world, please email webmaster@killtheapostrophe.com. If it took you more than an hour to think of, it doesnt count. The fact that most people are unable to think of a single real-world example which left them genuinely confused about a meaning, or where they couldnt seek clarification from the context is the reason I think this objection is irrelevant."
Christian makes an agreement error but uses the right pronoun
“He’s not a guy who feels the suit to be constricting. Wearing the mask and putting on the suit gives him absolute freedom.” - Christian Bale, about his Batman character in The Dark Knight
Christian has made an error in subject/verb agreement. In the second sentence, the subject is the compound noun “Wearing the mask and putting on the suit,” which is plural. However, the verb, “gives,” is singular. One way to correct the error is to change the verb to its singular form.
“Wearing the mask and putting on the suit give him absolute freedom.”
In the first sentence, Christian correctly used the relative pronoun “who” to refer to “guy.” A common grammatical error is the use of “that” to refer to a person. Nice job, Christian!
mr. shifty

If anyone was fortunate enough to catch my brief stint on Grace's blog, you would have seen that my reason for gaining co-authorship was to publicly outline our ridiculous companionship.
the white house is full of ...



a day of celebration!
HOWEVER, today is a precious day for TWO reasons.
Number one ... It is Julie Axelrad's 22nd birthday. To one of my very first friends from the very first day of Kindergarten, we have spent some of the best years together and I look very forward to 22 more. Happy birthday pretty girl; have the best day ever. You deserve every one of your wildest wishes to come true.

And number two, (however, no less important or exciting!!) today is Jackie's first day of her career as intern extraordinaire at Teen Vogue.


To two of my oldest, closest and dearest friends: have beautiful, exciting days because you are beautiful and exciting girls. Thank you for being my friends and bringing your exuberant, breathtaking selves into my life.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
all I need now is a pint of ben and jerry's...
So I decided to take the plunge....
With her permission to use (read: steal) her coined "Daily [insert term here]" I have joined the throngs of people that feel the need to publish their life online with the irrational thought that anyone other than themselves (and, let's face it ... my mom) will read it.
Writing, I would love to say has been my chosen path because of my love for the written word. True. However, I will unabashedly admit that math and science were two subjects that decided to pick on me from early on in life. Rude, right? If only those two bullies had decided to shine their graces on me, I could be well on my way to a fattie paycheck and job security. Instead, thank you English classes, I am on a fast-track towards a dying field: Magazine Journalism.
As scary as I made that sound, I love magazines. I love reading them, I love learning from them and I especially love that there are at least thirty magazines for each hobby (hello, Wood Magazine). With that proclamation of love out of the way (just in case the job gods are looking....) I do look forward to my potential foray into the journalistic world in six short months; all starting with this blog.
I like to think that this will serve as writing practice before my word vomit will be in the hands of an unforgiving editor. Let us remember that The Devil Wears Prada was loosely based on reality, and by loosely, I mean ... a nearly-true story.
Here goes nothin', my vain attempt to bring insight on all that is: life, love, health and happiness.
Blogging anchors away!









